Research

Critical care, clinical AI, and decision science

Research focused on how clinical artificial intelligence, prediction models, and observational evidence behave in acute and high consequence care.

Critical Care + AI

Clinical AI in acute and critical illness

Development, evaluation, and critical appraisal of clinical AI for high acuity care, with emphasis on sepsis, severe infection, model discrimination, interpretability, bias, generalizability, and bedside clinical utility.

Outcome Ascertainment

Selective testing and label bias

Study of how surveillance intensity, selective diagnostic testing, missing outcomes, and workflow can shape the labels used to train prediction models. The central question is whether a model is learning disease biology or patterns of observation.

Read the full insight: Outcome Ascertainment Bias in Clinical AI
Decision Science

From prediction to treatment decisions

Research connecting clinical prediction with causal inference, treatment effect heterogeneity, and individualized decision support. The goal is to move beyond asking who is at risk toward determining which patient may benefit from a particular intervention.

Acute Illness Outcomes

Sepsis and cardiovascular outcomes

Clinical outcomes research in sepsis, severe infection, and acute illness associated atrial fibrillation, including competing risks, treatment selection, and longitudinal outcomes.

Related Clinical Domains

Transplantation, kidney disease, pulmonary medicine, and surgery

Collaborative research in complex clinical populations where surveillance, selection, longitudinal outcomes, and treatment decisions are especially important.

Research theme: reliable clinical evidence requires understanding how patients are observed, tested, treated, and documented.